Rearview cameras sound like a good bet if you're concerned about safety,
but a new study just published by the Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety indicates that their benefits may be limited. Parking sensors,
says the study, provided drivers with no more safety protection than
using just your mirrors, and combining those and backup cams together
was actually more dangerous in some cases.
The study examined 111
volunteers who were asked to perform normal driving behaviors. When
they left a parking spot, the cutout of a child either jumped up or
moved into place to surprised them. The vehicles were equipped with
parking sensors, backup cameras, both or neither.
The study
results are surprising. For the stationary object: 100 percent of those
tested using just their mirrors hit it, about 95 percent with parking
sensors, 56 percent with the camera and 75 percent with the both. For
the moving obstacle: 13 percent collided with it using no technology,
about 40 percent with the sensors, 13 percent with the camera and less
than 10 percent for the combo.
Parking sensors were found to be
almost useless in these cases. The major problem was that they had a
range of only around eight feet, which doesn't give enough time to
react. They were made even less helpful in combination with backup cams
because drivers were less likely to look at the video display when they
had a parking system.
"Right now cameras appear to be the most
promising technology for addressing this particularly tragic type of
crash, which frequently claims the lives of young children in the
driveways of their own homes," says David Zuby, the group's executive
vice president and chief research officer, in a statement on the
official site of the IIHS. It also provides an abstracted view of the
study and graph showing each system's effectiveness. Take a look for the
full results.
As read on:
http://www.autoblog.com/2014/03/17/iihs-rearview-cameras-parking-sensors/?ncid=edlinkusauto00000016&ts=1395058169